Systems thinking and creative problem-solving

This common course will equip PhD candidates to tackle real-world sustainability challenges through hands-on collaboration with partners across the public and private sectors.

Bilde
People problem-solving
Photo: UX Indonesia on Unsplash

The purpose of these mandatory joint sessions is to equip the PhD candidates at BSRS with problem-solving methods that facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration with a strong focus on research impact. 

In this course, you will be asked to make sense of a somewhat wicked problem in small teams of participants from the other parallell courses.

You will be provided with tools to help you overcome obstacles associated with multidisciplinary teamwork and to drive you forward in with might seem like an impossible task. At the end of the summer school, you will have produced a policy brief on a real-life problem.

The interdisciplinary sessions consist of two parts:

  • Theoretical part: systems thinking and creative problem-solving.
  • Practical part: work in interdisciplinary teams using the methods for solving concrete societal challenges.

Through collaboration with public and private sector institutions—referred to as “problem owners”—you engage with real-world issues and gain hands-on experience in applied research. Each year, new problem owners provide a fresh context and a set of challenges.

You will receive both theoretical input and practical guidance in systems thinking, creative problem-solving, and relevant methodologies. 

Working in interdisciplinary teams, you apply these tools to analyse the problem, generate new insights, and co-create solutions. The course culminates in a policy brief designed to offer actionable recommendations to the institution that provided the challenge.

Learning outcomes

Express knowledge and understanding
  • Participants have an overview of the most frequently used methods in systems thinking and creative problem-solving.

Apply knowledge and understanding

  • Participants can apply those tools that are appropriate for the innovation challenge.
  • Participants can identify appropriate boundaries for the challenge.
Communicate
  • Participants can adopt a problem owner’s perspective to effectively summarise the challenge, describe the methods for solving that challenge and the implications of the proposed solutions.
Learning skills
  • Participants are able to organise efficient and effective communication within interdisciplinary teams
  • Participants are able to engage in the co-creation process
Literature list

Sustainable development and innovation
  • Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., . . . Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-04933-170211
  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., van Leeuwen, E. S., Oosterhuis, F. H., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. T. (2007). Social learning by doing in sustainable transport innovations: Ex-post analysis of common factors behind successes and failures. Research Policy, 36(2), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.001
Systems thinking and participatory systems mapping
  • Allender, S., Owen, B., Kuhlberg, J., Lowe, J., Nagorcka-Smith, P., Whelan, J., & Bell, C. (2015). A community based systems diagram of obesity causes. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0129683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129683
  • Hovmand, P. S., Andersen, D. F., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Richardson, G. P., Rux, K., & Calhoun, A. (2012). Group model-building ‘Scripts’ as a collaborative planning tool. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(2), 179-193. doi: 10.1002/sres.2105
  • Videira N., Antunes P., Santos R. (2017) Engaging Stakeholders in Environmental and Sustainability Decisions with Participatory System Dynamics Modeling. In: Gray S., Paolisso M., Jordan R., Gray S. (eds) Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders. Springer, Cham
Creative problem solving
  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation.
  • Ness, I. J., & Søreide, G. E. (2014). The Room of Opportunity: Understanding phases of creative knowledge processes in innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(8), 545-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0077
  • Ness, I. J., & Riese, H. (2015). Openness, curiosity and respect: Underlying conditions for developing innovative knowledge and ideas between disciplines. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6 (September 2015), 29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.001
  • Ness, I. J. (2017). Polyphonic Orchestration: Understanding how leaders facilitate creative knowledge processes in interdisciplinary groups working with innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81-92.
Course leaders


Birgit Kopainsky is professor in System Dynamics at the University of Bergen and the leader of the System Dynamics Group. She holds a PhD in agricultural economics and a master’s degree in Geography and Environmental Studies. 

Kopainsky's research explores the role that system dynamics can play in facilitating transformation processes in social-ecological systems such as the transformation towards sustainable and resilient agri-food systems. She conducts and supervises research both in Europe and in developing countries.

Ingunn Johanne Ness is a senior researcher and Cluster Leader at the Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology (SLATE). She has a PhD from the University of Bergen and a postdoc from SLATE. Ness leads the innovative research futures efforts in SLATE and carries out research on interdisciplinary collaboration, innovation, creativity, and leadership. 

Ness has a particular interest for the sociocultural approach and works with the world’s leading environments on sociocultural theory, the OSAT group at the University of Oxford and Webster Center for Creativity and Innovation. In addition, Ness collaborates with businesses, such as Equinor.

Course stages

  • Understanding the problem: research and workshops with problem owners to grasp the problem's context, including power dynamics, incentives, and cultural norms.
  • Literature study
  • Creating and preparing for impact: intensive hackathon sessions to develop and test solutions.

This integrated approach fosters new thinking and practical solutions for sustainable development.

Systems thinking over the years

Systems thinking has been a core component of the Bergen Summer Research School since 2021. During the pandemic years (2020–2022), the course was adapted to an online format with interactive group sessions. 

Learning festival BSRS 2023
Learning festival: One of the BSRS 2023 teams presenting their policy brief. Photo: UiB

Facilitators guided teams of 10–15 participants through systems mapping exercises, using sample maps included in the facilitation manual (external link) (PDF).

 

Three report covers
Covers of three SDG Bergen Policy Briefs created by BSRS students. Photo: UiB

Check out highlights from previous years and discover how systems thinking continues to shape the interdisciplinary collaboration at BSRS.

2025: Systems perspectives on sustainability and justice

 

In 2025, the participants developed policy briefs addressing "just climate mitigation options". The scale of the policy brief could be global or more localised on regional/national/sub-national level.

Throughout the interdisciplinary course, they worked with FRIDA Global Climate Simulator — an integrated assessment model that helps explore the direct and indirect, anticipated and unanticipated, consequences of potential climate mitigation options. 

FRIDA is being developed in the Horizon Europe project WorldTrans – Transparent Assessments for Real People

The policy briefs developed during the course:

 

2024: Education 2030 and beyond —Addressing global challenges

 

In 2024, we partnered with UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education (UNESCO IESALC) to address how higher education institutions contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Participants focused on key social, environmental, and economic goals, exploring their interconnections and the role of universities in advancing them through teaching, research, public engagement, and governance.

Teams that produced high-quality drafts were invited to publish short blog posts on the UNESCO IESALC’s website and to collaborate with a UNESCO policy analyst on a joint publication.

The ten policy briefs of BSRS 2024:
2023: Childhood — Nurturing care for building the future

 

In 2023, we collaborated with SOS Children’s Villages. The challenge was to develop policy briefs on questions related to child protection and welfare, like how to deal with the right of children and parents to reunification and contact, and services for unaccompanied refugee youth.

The nine policy briefs:
2022: Understanding and addressing inequality

 

In 2022, we partnered with UNICEF to look at inclusive policies that empower individuals to reach their full potential—starting with the fulfilment of basic needs.

Participants were invited to develop policy recommendations aimed at diverse stakeholders, including individual citizens, institutional leaders, national policymakers, and private sector executives. The goal was to create frameworks that:

  • Address multiple dimensions of wellbeing—individual, family, society, and planet
  • Enable gradual implementation by international organizations such as UNICEF
  • Recognise that individual wellbeing is both a driver and a result of collective wellbeing
The policy briefs:
2021: Science and society towards the Sustainable Development Goals

 

We partnered with SDG Bergen to focus on the SDG Bergen Policy Brief series. The participants were challenged to develop their own policy briefs centred on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) nexuses—highlighting the interconnections between specific targets and goals, with the aim of enhancing positive synergies and reducing trade-offs.

Participants were asked to:

  • Select specific SDG targets or indicators and provide policy recommendations based on their own or others’ research
  • Apply the principle of “local experience – global relevance” to ensure their briefs would resonate with policymakers across contexts
The policy briefs:

Of these, three were turned into SDG Bergen Policy Briefs:

Last updated: 10.02.2026